This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0090591709340136v1 37/5/649    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Haysom, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Communicating Depth

Habermas and Merleau-Ponty on Language and Praxis

University of Ottawa and Carleton University Ottawa, Canada

This essay takes as its task the critical comparison of two thinkers who are rarely matched or studied in tandem: Jürgen Habermas and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. It stages a (largely) speculative dialogue between the two thinkers, considering not only the points of convergence but their likely objections to each other’s accounts of communication and language. I will argue that Merleau-Ponty, whose own concerns significantly overlap with Habermas’s, while simultaneously pulling in a different direction, serves as a useful counter-point to Habermas. This is so because Merleau-Ponty offers us an intersubjectivist account of praxis, from which can be extrapolated an ethics of communicative engagement between self, other, and world. Such a phenomenological and/or existential rereading of the central Habermasian problematic not only compensates for the notorious abstraction of Discourse Ethics, but better underscores possibilities for social transformation inherent in intersubjectivity and the lifeworld than are acknowledged by Habermas.

Key Words: Habermas • Merleau-Ponty • communication • language • intersubjectivity

This version was published on October 1, 2009

Political Theory, Vol. 37, No. 5, 649-675 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0090591709340136


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?