Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Theory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

American Nightmare

Neoliberalism, Neoconservatism, and De-Democratization

Wendy Brown

University of California, Berkeley

Neoliberalism and neoconservatism are two distinct political rationalities in the contemporary United States. They have few overlapping formal characteristics, and even appear contradictory in many respects. Yet they converge not only in the current presidential administration but also in their de-democratizing effects. Their respective devaluation of political liberty, equality, substantive citizenship, and the rule of law in favor of governance according to market criteria on the one side, and valorization of state power for putatively moral ends on the other, undermines both the culture and institutions of constitutional democracy. Above all, the two rationalities work symbiotically to produce a subject relatively indifferent to veracity and accountability in government and to political freedom and equality among the citizenry.

Key Words: neoliberalism • neoconservatism • democracy • de-democratization

Political Theory, Vol. 34, No. 6, 690-714 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0090591706293016


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Theoretical CriminologyHome page
T. Monahan
Identity theft vulnerability: Neoliberal governance through crime construction
Theoretical Criminology, May 1, 2009; 13(2): 155 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
R. Kerr
Reviews Section: The Clinton Charisma: A Legacy of Leadership DONALD T. PHILLIPS. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 247 pp. + illus., ISBN 13 97814039 78166, 101403978166 Hail to the CEO: The Failure of George W. Bush and the Cult of Moral Leadership JAMES HOOPES. Westport, CT and London: Praeger, 2008. xiv + 131 pp. ISBN (hbk) 9780313347849
Management Learning, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 213 - 218.
[PDF]


Home page
Cultural Studies <=> Critical MethodologiesHome page
T. Monahan
Dreams of Control at a Distance: Gender, Surveillance, and Social Control
Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, April 1, 2009; 9(2): 286 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]