| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
The Force of Political ArgumentTrent University In this essay, the author examines the tensions that emerge between the practice of essay writing and a commitment to philosophical justification as themodel for political argument in contemporary political thought. He focuses on Jürgen Habermass adoption of the performative contradiction as an ideal for communicative exchange and shows the unacknowledged role that sincerity plays in Habermass argument. He then links this account to his explorations of the rise of aesthetic criticism in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and its contribution to democratic thought. Turning to one of the key literary and political critics of the period, William Hazlitt, the author shows how his theory of essay composition lends itself to a radical democratic imaginary that complicates the account of political argument Habermas sets out. Hazlitts essays, the author concludes, are exemplary in their embracing of contradiction as a condition of democratic life.
Key Words: essay sincerity grotesque aesthetics performative contradiction Habermas Hazlitt
Political Theory, Vol. 32, No. 6,
825-848 (2004) |
|||