This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0090591708317902v1 36/4/607    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Wendt, A. Articles by Duvall, R. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Sovereignty and the UFO

¹ The Ohio State University
² University of Minnesota

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Wendt.23{at}polisci.osu.edu.

	Abstract

Modern sovereignty is anthropocentric, constituted and organized by reference to human beings alone. Although a metaphysical assumption, anthropocentrism is of immense practical import, enabling modern states to command loyalty and resources from their subjects in pursuit of political projects. It has limits, however, which are brought clearly into view by the authoritative taboo on taking UFOs seriously. UFOs have never been systematically investigated by science or the state, because it is assumed to be known that none are extraterrestrial. Yet in fact this is not known, which makes the UFO taboo puzzling given the ET possibility. Drawing on the work of Giorgio Agamben, Michel Foucault, and Jacques Derrida, the puzzle is explained by the functional imperatives of anthropocentric sovereignty, which cannot decide a UFO exception to anthropocentrism while preserving the ability to make such a decision. The UFO can be "known" only by not asking what it is.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?